Fallingwater River

About 1814 John McDowell settled near this spot on the Fallingwater River in Tennessee. He owned 30 acres. When John died about 1819, his estate included a horse valued at $97.25. Most horses that I have seen in estate settlements were valued at $7-$15. John owned a valuable stud horse. Had it been a famous racehorse?



This photo was taken at Burgess Park, which is open to the public. Burgess Park has three waterfalls; this is Little Falls. Burgess Park is near Sparta and Cookeville in Middle Tennessee.

Monday, January 17, 2011

Who was Married to ANDREW McDole/Mcdowell ?

I have found one woman who may be Andrew's widow. I have not yet found her attached to a spouse.

In 1850 with a McMinnville Post Office, District 4, Warren County, Tennessee. Family 493.

William Roberts .....25 .....Ten
Centitha Roberts....24.....Ten
Stacy M. Roberts.....4.....Ten
William A. Roberts...3.....Ten
Adrian Roberts....3/12.....Ten
Sarah McDowel.......50.....N. C.
James McDowel......18.....Ten

From the census, it seems Cynthia could have been Andrew's oldest daughter. James McDowell would fit the birth date of the youngest son. Sarah is the right age and from a reasonable location to be Andrew's wife. McMinnville isn't far from DeKalb County; it's one of the larger cities on the road SW of Sparta.

There is another Sarah McDowell, a widow, living in Missouri in 1870 who was married to Samuel McDowell of Coffee County, Tennessee. They are living together in 1850. For about an hour I thought she might have been Andrew's widow as I chased down her various children, but then I found Sarah with her husband. I have saved the data in my computer in case Samuel turns out to be a relative. He's a good candidate to be Andrew's older brother.

Another woman considered to be a daughter of Andrew and his wife, Mississippi [Sippy] McDowell, is married to William Steele . William Steele and Sippy McDowell married in October 1848 in DeKalb County, Tennessee. From the 1850 and 1860 census she seems to have been born in 1829 or 1830. This is too old to be the youngest daughter in the family; the youngest girl seems to have been born after 1835, if the information in the 1840 census is correct. Again, I don't have many answers, but I'll share with you what I have found.

No comments:

Post a Comment